Soros and Equilibrium: Holiday Reading 1
While I was away, perhaps slightly masochistically*, I read the new Soros book, The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What it Means. It is not a particularly good summary of what happened, nor a detailed analysis of why it happened, but it does make an interesting point. Soros claims, I think very plausibly, that finance is reflexive, that is that the very study of it changes the object being studied. I have written about this before, but it is interesting to see Soros making much of the role of reflexity in the formation of asset price bubbles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82e65/82e65de477ee9655e674cc53f1d689e40020e18a" alt=""
Of course, this feature of finance renders the received wisdom of classical economics rather suspect. In particular, models in finance are not time-stable in the same way that a good piece of science is, simply because the way market practitioners behave changes. The S&P return distribution with over half of all trades done by machine (2008) is unlikely to be the as that when most of the market went via floor traders (1988).
* 'We read popular finance books so you don't have to dot com' has not, funnily enough, been registered as a domain name...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82e65/82e65de477ee9655e674cc53f1d689e40020e18a" alt=""
Of course, this feature of finance renders the received wisdom of classical economics rather suspect. In particular, models in finance are not time-stable in the same way that a good piece of science is, simply because the way market practitioners behave changes. The S&P return distribution with over half of all trades done by machine (2008) is unlikely to be the as that when most of the market went via floor traders (1988).
* 'We read popular finance books so you don't have to dot com' has not, funnily enough, been registered as a domain name...
Labels: Economic Theory, Financial Models
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home